Lawrence H.
Summers, Summers Blog: A badly designed US stimulus will only hurt the working
class. Populist
economics will play out differently in the US than in emerging markets. But the
results will be no better. All with a stake in the global economy must
hope that now, as has happened often in the past, a US president faced with the
responsibility of governing preserves the valid core of campaign economic plans
while making major adjustments. Not even US presidents with political mandates can
repeal the laws of economics.
Olivier Blanchard,
PIIE: In Light of the Elections: Recession, Expansion, and Inequality. So, in the end, expansion or recession will depend
on the balance between macroeconomic and trade measures. My own guess is the
first will dominate, and growth will be sustained, at least for some time. Will
it be enough to satisfy those who voted for Donald Trump, worried about their
incomes and their futures? I am not so sure. Growth will indeed lift most
boats. But many measures will push in the opposite direction. Lower corporate
taxes, lower personal taxes on the rich, and financial deregulation will
increase the share of output going to capital (this probably explains in part
what is happening to the stock market). Tariffs on foreign goods may save some middle class jobs
but will destroy others and increase the cost of living for those at the bottom
end of the income distribution. Inequality may well go up, not down
Zidong An, IMF:The
Evidence that Growth Creates Jobs: A New Look at an Old Relationship. New research from the IMF looks at Okun’s Law and
asks, based on the evidence, will growth create jobs? The findings show a striking variation across
countries in how employment responds to GDP growth over the course of a year.
In some countries, when growth picks up, employment goes up and unemployment
falls; in other countries the response is quite muted. A pick-up in
growth—through a stimulus to the demand side of the economy, for instance
increased government spending on infrastructure—will result in more jobs.
Heather Hurlburt,
Project Syndicate:The Myth of the Women’s Vote. It may seem surprising that only 54% of the female electorate voted for
Hillary Clinton, the first woman nominated for president by a major party. But while gender is a strong
marker for how Americans think about certain issues, it is not the best
predictor of how they will vote. It turns out that female candidates do
not face a single gender gap, but rather multiple gender gaps.
Stumbling and
Mumbling Blog: Is globalization to blame? Donald Trump’s victory is being seen as a backlash against
globalization. For me, this poses the question: to what extent is globalization
to blame for the decline in many workers’ real incomes? The answer, I suspect,
is: not much. These papers by Ann Harrison and colleagues and Jonathan Haskel
and colleagues show that it
is very hard to link declining US real wages to increased openness to trade.
Equally, it is unproven (to say the least) whether increased immigration has
contributed to falling wages: George Borjas’s claim that it is has has been
sharply challenged.
Binyamin
Appelbaum, NYT: A Little-Noticed Fact About Trade: It’s No Longer Rising. The growth of trade among nations is among the most
consequential and controversial economic developments of recent decades. Yet despite the noisy debates,
which have reached new heights during this presidential campaign, it is a
little-noticed fact that trade is no longer rising. The volume of global
trade was flat in the first quarter of 2016, then fell by 0.8 percent in the
second quarter, according to statisticians in the Netherlands, which happens to
keep the best data.
Arthur Turrell,
BoE: Power and progress. Energy is the
fundamental currency of the physical world, while GDP is the imperfect
catch-all measure of economic progress. Across countries, electricity and GDP
are very strongly correlated. But which way does the causality go? Studies have
found evidence for GDP causing electricity generation, electricity generation
causing GDP and for a bi-directional relationship. For the UK, the evidence suggests that it is
a bi-directional dependence, based on a bootstrapped Granger causality test. Given over 85% of the world’s
primary energy consumption comes from fossil fuels, countries around the world
are either going to have to find new ways to produce power or break the link
between GDP and electricity – whichever direction the causality runs.
Tim Gohmann,
behavioraleconomics.com: How Donald Trump Won the Election: A Behavioral
Economics Explanation. Trump’s campaign execution was a
simple yet elegant display of behavioral economics in practice as follows:
1. IDENTIFICATION — make such disparaging remarks about minorities that the
core target “see themselves” in the candidate; 2. UTILITY — communicate the
most motivating expected campaign result to the core target — a restoration of
the value of their labor (and financial status), the cornerstone to making
America great again; and 3. LOSS AVERSION — motivate the core target by
suggesting that this was their only chance to recover their social and
financial status, thereby empowering them to turn out in such record numbers
that the opposition was overwhelmed.
Paul Krugman, NYT:
The Economic Fallout. It really does
now look like President Trump, and markets are plunging. When might we expect
them to recover? Frankly, I find it hard to care much, even though this is my
specialty. The disaster for America and the world has so many aspects that the
economic ramifications are way down my list of things to fear. Still, I guess
people want an answer: if the question is when markets will recover, a
first-pass answer is never.
Lawrence H. Summers,
Harvard University: Voters sour on traditional economic policy. It can hardly come as a great surprise that when
economic growth falls short year after year and when its beneficiaries are a
small subset of the population, electorates turn surly. They lose confidence in
traditional policy approaches and their advocates. Looking back at the
political traumas of 1968 when there were people in the streets in many
countries, it is clear that there was something going on beyond specific issues
like Vietnam in the US. In
the same way as with Brexit, the rise of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, the
strength of rightwing nationalists in many European countries, Vladimir Putin’s
strength in Russia and the return of Mao worship in China, it is hard to escape
the conclusion that the world is seeing a renaissance of populist
authoritarianism. It is hard to escape the conclusion that the world is
seeing a renaissance of populist authoritarianism.
José Cuesta, Mario
Negre, Christoph Lakner, VOX: Know your facts: Poverty numbers. The percentage of people living in extreme poverty
around the world has fallen by more than half over the past three decades. But polls show that most people are
not only ignorant of this fact, but believe that poverty has increased.
This column explores progress towards ending global poverty by 2030, the first
of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. Poverty figures have fallen around
the world since 1990, and there is a broad consensus on the policies needed for
further reductions. Eradicating global poverty is achievable, but it is
dependent on global and domestic political cooperation.
Nancy Cartwright,
Angus Deaton, VOX: The limitations of randomised controlled trials. In recent years, the use of randomised controlled
trials has spread from labour market and welfare programme evaluation to other
areas of economics, and to other social sciences, perhaps most prominently in
development and health economics. This column argues that some of the popularity of such trials rests
on misunderstandings about what they are capable of accomplishing, and
cautions against simple extrapolations from trials to other contexts.
The National
Infrastructure Commission, UK: Call for Evidence. The Commission is a permanent body that “will operate
independently, at arm’s length from government, as an executive agency of HM
Treasury”. NIC has been
established to provide the government with impartial, expert advice on major
long-term infrastructure challenges. The Commission is launching a 15 week call
for evidence to provide input into the development of its National
Infrastructure Assessment. The Commission has identified 28 key
questions which it believes will be important to answer in order to understand the
main infrastructure challenges facing the country over the coming decades.
Patrick Bennett,
Amine Ouazad, VOX: The relationship between job displacement and crime. A substantial body of literature finds significant
effects of unemployment rates on crime rates. However, relatively little is
known about the direct impact of individual unemployment on individual crime.
This column examines the effect of job displacement on crime using 15 years of
Danish administrative data. Being
subject to a sudden and unexpected mass-layoff is found to increase the
probability that an individual commits a crime. However, the findings
stress the importance of policies targeting education and income inequality in
mitigating crime.
Ángel Ubide, VOX: The case for an active fiscal policy. The pre-crisis consensus was, and remains, very
strong – the business cycle would be managed by monetary policy, while fiscal
policy would focus solely on debt sustainability. In a world of zero interest rates, however, fiscal policy
has to contribute to supporting aggregate demand and protecting against
deflationary risks. This column outlines three ways in which a
well-designed expansionary fiscal policy stance can contribute to better
economic outcomes.
Stephen Redding,
David Weinstein, VOX: What big data tells us about real income growth. Big data stands to transform economic measurement in
substantial ways. The volume and precision of data available allows economists
to revisit the foundational assumptions underpinning common indexes. This
column presents a new empirical methodology that leverages big data to
translate nominal numbers into real output or welfare. ‘The unified approach’
nests major price indexes and addresses implicit biases in these measures. An examination with barcode data
suggests that standard methods of measuring welfare overstate cost of living
increases by ignoring new products and demand shifts.
Melanie Arntz,
Terry Gregory, Ulrich Zierahn, OECD: The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD
Countries. A Comparative Analysis. In recent years, there has been a revival of concerns that automation
and digitalisation might after all result in a jobless future. These studies
follow an occupation-based approach proposed by Frey and Osborne (2013), i.e.
they assume that whole occupations rather than single job-tasks are automated
by technology. We estimate the job automatibility of jobs for 21 OECD countries
based on a task-based approach. In contrast to other studies, we take into
account the heterogeneity of workers’ tasks within occupations. Overall, we find that, on average
across the 21 OECD countries, 9 % of jobs are automatable. The threat from
technological advances thus seems much less pronounced compared to the
occupation-based approach. We further find heterogeneities across OECD
countries. For instance, while the share of automatable jobs is 6 % in Korea,
the corresponding share is 12 % in Austria. Differences between countries may
reflect general differences in workplace organisation, differences in previous
investments into automation technologies as well as differences in the
education of workers across countries.
OECD Statistics
Directorate: Statistical Insights: What does GDP per capita tell us about
households’ material well-being? The preferred
measure of people’s material well-being is household disposable income per
capita, which represents the maximum amount a household can consume without
having to reduce its assets or to increase its liabilities. The above-mentioned
factors can create
significant differences between measures of household disposable income per
capita and GDP per capita. The United States for example see its position
relative to the OECD average jump by more than 10 percentage points. On the
other hand, Norway falls from 1st on a GDP basis to 4th on a household
disposable income basis while Ireland drops dramatically. Switzerland also sees
falls in its household income vs GDP ranking, partly because of the relatively
large number of cross-border workers.
Manudeep Bhuller,
Gordon B. Dahl, Katrine V. Løken, Magne Mogstad, University of
Chicago: Incarceration, Recidivism and Employment. We construct a panel dataset containing the criminal
behavior and labor market outcomes of the entire population, and exploit the
random assignment of criminal cases to judges who differ systematically in
their stringency in sentencing defendants to prison. Using judge stringency as
an instrumental variable, we
find that imprisonment discourages further criminal behavior, and that the
reduction extends beyond incapacitation. Incarceration decreases the
probability an individual will reoffend within 5 years by 27 percentage points,
and reduces the number of offenses over this same period by 10 criminal
charges. In comparison, OLS shows positive associations between
incarceration and subsequent criminal behavior. This sharp contrast suggests
the high rates of recidivism among ex-convicts is due to selection, and not a
consequence of the experience of being in prison. Exploring factors that may
explain the preventive effect of incarceration, we find the decline in crime is
driven by individuals who were not working prior to incarceration. Contrary to
the widely embraced ‘nothing works’ doctrine, these findings demonstrate that time
spent in prison with a focus on rehabilitation can indeed be preventive.
Robert J. Shiller, Times: What’s Behind a Rise in Ethnic Nationalism?
Maybe the Economy. It is natural to ask whether something so broad might
have a common cause, other than the obvious circumstantial causes like the
gradual fading of memories about the horrors of ethnic conflict in World War II
or the rise in this century of forms of violent ethnic terrorism. Economics is my specialty, and I
think economic factors may explain at least part of the trend.
Pascal
Mittermaier, Project Syndicate: How Trees Make Cities Healthier. Heat waves account for more deaths than any other
type of weather-related event, killing more than 12,000 people worldwide each
year. Making matters worse, cities tend to have higher rates of air pollution,
especially fine particulate matter (PM) resulting from the combustion of fossil
fuels and biomass, which contributes to up to three million deaths every year. Fortunately, there is a simple
step that municipal leaders can take to reduce both extreme heat and air
pollution: plant more trees.
John Fernald, FED
San Francisco: What Is the New Normal for U.S. Growth? Estimates
suggest the new normal for U.S. GDP growth has dropped to between 1½ and 1¾%,
noticeably slower than the typical postwar pace. The slowdown stems mainly from demographics and educational
attainment. As baby boomers retire, employment growth shrinks. And educational
attainment of the workforce has plateaued, reducing its contribution to
productivity growth through labor quality. The GDP growth forecast assumes
that, apart from these effects, the modest productivity growth is relatively
“normal”—in line with its pace for most of the period since 1973.
Adam Chandler, The
Atlantic: Why Do Americans Move So Much More Than Europeans? Decades of data, including a more recent Gallup
study, characterizes the United States as one of the most geographically mobile
countries in the world. According to data from the U.S. Census Bureau, the
average person in the United States moves residences more than 11 times in his
or her lifetime. According to a survey conducted by the real-estate company
Re/Max earlier this year, that figure across 16 European countries is roughly
four. More than half of interstate migrants said they moved for
employment-related reasons. Workers in the U.S. now “put in almost 25 percent
more hours than Europeans” in a given year. Fatih Karahan and Darius Li at the
New York Fed are the latest to note that U.S. workers are moving around less than before. Karahan
and Li put much stock in the effects of an aging workforce, to which
they attribute “at least half” of the decline in interstate migration.
Caroline M. Hoxby, NBER: The Dramatic Economics of the U.S. Market for Higher Education. I show the productivity of institutions across this
market. Strikingly, among institutions that experience strong market forces,
the productivity of a dollar of educational resources is fairly similar, even
if the schools serve students with substantially different CR. On the other
hand, among institutions that experience weak market forces, productivity is
lower and more dispersed. These facts suggest that market forces are needed to keep schools productive
and to allocate resources across schools in a way that assures that the
marginal return to additional resources at different institutions is roughly
comparable.
Richard Susskind,
Daniel Susskind, Harvard Business Review: Robots Will Replace Doctors, Lawyers,
and Other Professionals. Most mainstream
professionals — doctors, lawyers, accountants, and so on — believe they will
emerge largely unscathed. During our consulting work and at conferences, we
regularly hear practitioners concede that routine work can be taken on by
machines, but they maintain that human experts will always be needed for the
tricky stuff that calls for judgment, creativity, and empathy. Our research and
analysis challenges the idea that these professionals will be spared. We expect that within decades
the traditional professions will be dismantled, leaving most, but not all,
professionals to be replaced by less-expert people, new types of experts, and
high-performing systems.
Hansen, Bertel
Teilfeldt et al, Epidemiology: The consequences of daylight savings time
transitions on the incidence rate of unipolar depressive episodes. Daylight savings time (DST) transitions affect
approximately 1.6 billion people worldwide. Prior studies have documented
associations between DST transitions and adverse health outcomes. Using time
series intervention analysis of nationwide data from the Danish Psychiatric
Central Research Register from 1995 to 2012 we compared the observed trend in
the incidence rate of hospital contacts for unipolar depressive episodes after
the transitions to and from summer time to the predicted trend in the incidence
rate. The analyses were
based on 185.419 hospital contacts for unipolar depression and showed that the
transition from summer time to standard time led to an 11 percent increase (95%
CI: 7, 15%) in the incidence rate of hospital contacts for unipolar depressive
episodes that dissipated over approximately 10 weeks.
Austin C. Smith,
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics: Spring Forward at Your Own Risk:
Daylight Saving Time and Fatal Vehicle Crashes. Daylight Saving Time (DST) impacts over 1.5 billion people, yet many
of its impacts on practicing populations remain uncertain. Exploiting the
discrete nature of DST transitions and a 2007 policy change, I estimate the
impact of DST on fatal automobile crashes. My results imply that from 2002–2011 the transition
into DST caused over 30 deaths at a social cost of $275 million annually.
Employing four tests to decompose the aggregate effect into an ambient light or
sleep mechanism, I find that shifting ambient light only reallocates fatalities
within a day, while sleep deprivation caused by the spring transition increases
risk.
Havranek, Tomas,
Herman, Dominik, Irsova, Zuzana, MPRA: Does Daylight Saving Save Energy? A
Meta-Analysis. The original
rationale for adopting daylight saving time (DST) was energy savings. Modern
research studies, however, question the magnitude and even direction of the
effect of DST on energy consumption. Representing the first meta-analysis in this literature, we collect 162
estimates from 44 studies and find that the mean reported estimate indicates
modest energy savings: 0.34% during the days when DST applies. Energy
savings are larger for countries farther away from the equator, while
subtropical regions consume more energy because of DST.
Jochen Bittner,
NYT: What Do Trump and Marx Have in Common? We have a word in German, “Wutbürger,” which means “angry citizen”. Wutbürgers
lie at both ends of the political spectrum. A Wutbürger rages against a new
train station and tilts against wind turbines. Many British Wutbürgers voted
for Brexit. French Wutbürgers will vote for Marine Le Pen’s National Front.
Perhaps the most powerful Wutbürger of them all is Donald J. Trump. Which
raises the question: How was anger hijacked? Karl Marx was a Wutbürger. The
upper class has gained much more from the internationalization of trade and
finances than the working class has, often in obscene ways. We live in a world, the liberal
British historian Timothy Garton Ash noted lately, “which would have Marx
rubbing his hands with Schadenfreude.” In Germany a recent poll showed that
only 14 percent of the citizens trusted the politicians.
Etienne Gagnon,
Benjamin K. Johannsen, David Lopez-Salido, FED: Understanding the New Normal:
The Role of Demographics. Since the Great
Recession, the U.S. economy has experienced low real GDP growth and low real
interest rates, including for long maturities. We show that these developments
were largely predictable by calibrating an overlapping-generation model with a
rich demographic structure to observed and projected changes in U.S.
population, family composition, life expectancy, and labor market activity. The
model accounts for a 1¼{percentage-point decline in both real GDP growth and
the equilibrium real interest rate since 1980|essentially all of the permanent
declines in those variables according to some estimates. The model also implies
that these declines were especially pronounced over the past decade or so
because of demographic factors most-directly associated with the post-war baby
boom and the passing of the information technology boom. Our results further suggest that
real GDP growth and real interest rates will remain low in coming decades,
consistent with the U.S. economy having reached a “new normal."
Alan B. Krueger,
Princeton University: Where Have All the Workers Gone? The labor force participation rate in the U.S. has
declined since 2007 primarily because of population aging and ongoing trends
that preceded the recession. The participation rate has evolved differently,
and for different reasons, across demographic groups. A rise in school
enrollment has largely offset declining participation for young workers since
the 1990s. Participation
in the labor force has been declining for prime age men for decades, and about
half of prime age men who are not in the labor force (NLF) may have a serious
health condition that is a barrier to work. Nearly half of prime age NLF
men take pain medication on a daily basis, and in nearly two-thirds of cases
they take prescription pain medication. The labor force participation rate has
stopped rising for cohorts of women born after 1960. Prime age men who are out
of the labor force report that they experience notably low levels of emotional
well-being throughout their days and that they derive relatively little meaning
from their daily activities.
The Economist: The
superstar company. A giant problem. There are some worrying similarities to a much earlier era. In
1860-1917 the global economy was reshaped by the rise of giant new industries
(steel and oil) and revolutionary new technologies (electricity and the
combustion engine). These disruptions led to brief bursts of competition
followed by prolonged periods of oligopoly. The business titans of that age
reinforced their positions by driving their competitors out of business and
cultivating close relations with politicians. The backlash that followed helped
to destroy the liberal order in much of Europe. So, by all means celebrate the astonishing
achievements of today’s superstar companies. But also watch them. The world
needs a healthy dose of competition to keep today’s giants on their toes and to
give those in their shadow a chance to grow.
Peter Coy,
Businessweek: How to Raise the Retirement Age for People Who Want to Work. Most Americans are healthy enough to work longer
than they actually do. The economists look at the health of those men and what
share of them is working and compare them with men at older ages. The study finds
that health declines slowly with age, but work declines rapidly. The pattern is
the same for women. Poor
health, in other words, isn't what's pushing most people into retirement.
Unfortunately, there's no way to raise the retirement age that's problem-free.
Jennifer Doleac,
Benjamin Hansen, TIME: How Hiding Criminal Records Hurts Black and Hispanic
Men. If we want to reduce incarceration rates, we must
help ex-offenders build stable lives outside prison walls. One common method is
to “Ban The Box,” which amounts to preventing employers from asking about
applicants’ criminal records until late in the application process. (The policy
gets its name from the box that applicants are asked to check if they’ve been
convicted of a crime.) This seems like a good idea. But recent evidence suggests that BTB laws
do more harm than good. They actually decrease employment for young,
low-skilled black and Hispanic men overall, a group that already struggles to
get work even when they have committed no crime.
Carl
Gornitzki, Agne Larsson, Bengt Fadeel, BMJ: Freewheelin’ scientists: citing Bob
Dylan in the biomedical literature. In September 2014 it emerged that a group of scientists at the
Karolinska Institute in Sweden had been sneaking the lyrics of Bob Dylan into
their papers as part of a long running bet. Was this Dylan citing unique to the
Karolinska Institute? A
2015 analysis published in The BMJ found 727 potential references to Dylan
songs in a search of the Medline biomedical journals database; the authors
ultimately concluded that 213 of the references could be “classified as
unequivocally citing Dylan.” The earliest article the authors identified
appeared in 1970 in The Journal of Practical Nursing. The title? “The Times
They Are a-Changin’.
Paul Krugman: What
Have We Learned From The Crisis? The crisis of 2008 and its aftermath have taken place in an environment
in which conservative ideology retains a powerful position in real-world
politics and the academy alike. So relatively few economists or policymakers
have been willing to reconsider their views despite overwhelming empirical
refutation. Or to put it another way, one thing we seem to have learned from the crisis is that
many of our colleagues are less engaged in something like science, an attempt
to understand the world as it is, than we would like to think. Instead, when they
invoke evidence it’s the way a drunkard uses a lamppost: for support, not
illumination. The best excuse one can offer is that even hard scientists
are often reluctant to change their views – “Science progresses one funeral at
a time,” said Max Planck. But what I’m pointing out here isn’t just that too
few economists were willing to learn from the Great Recession, but that there’s
a notable contrast with the way the profession seized on the troubles of the
1970s. This asymmetry is what’s troubling, and suggests that politics and
ideology have distorted our field.
Kenneth Rogoff,
Project Syndicate: Is the Fed Playing Politics? In his recent debate with his opponent Hillary Clinton, Republican
presidential candidate Donald Trump pressed his claim that US Federal Reserve
Chair Janet Yellen is politically motivated. The Fed, Trump claims, is applying overdoses of monetary
stimulus to hypnotize voters into believing that economic recovery is underway.
It’s not a completely crazy idea, but I just don’t see it. If Yellen is
so determined to keep interest rates in a deep freeze, why has she been trying
in recent months to talk up longer-term rates by insisting that the Fed is
likely to hike rates faster than the market currently believes?
Larry Summers, FT:
Men Without Work. Job destruction
caused by technology is not a futuristic concern. It is something we have been living with for
two generations. A simple linear trend
suggests that by
mid-century about a quarter of men between 25 and 54 will not be working at any
moment. I think this is likely a substantial underestimate unless something is
done for a number of reasons.
First everything we hear and see regarding technology suggests the rate
of job destruction will pick up. Think
of the elimination of drivers, and of those who work behind cash
registers. Second, the gains in average
education and health of the workforce over the last 50 years are unlikely to be
repeated. Third, to the extent that
non-work is contagious, it is likely to grow exponentially rather than at a
linear rate. Fourth, declining marriage
rates are likely to raise rates of labor force withdrawal given that non-work
is much more common for unmarried than married men.
Katharine G.
Abraham el al. NBERT: The Consequences of Long Term Unemployment: Evidence from
Matched Employer-Employee Data. It is
well known that the long-term unemployed fare worse in the labor market than
the short-term unemployed, but less clear why this is so. The rich information
on work histories provided by the wage records allows us to control for
individual heterogeneity that could be affecting post-unemployment labor market
outcomes. Even with these controls in place, we find that unemployment duration has a
strongly negative effect on the likelihood of subsequent employment. This
finding is inconsistent with the “bad apple” (heterogeneity) explanation for
why the long-term unemployed fare worse than the short-term unemployed.
We also find that longer unemployment durations are associated with lower
subsequent earnings, though this is mainly attributable to the long-term unemployed
having a lower likelihood of subsequent employment rather than to their having
lower earnings once a job is found.
Ali Alichi, Kory
Kantenga, Juan Solé, IMF: Income Polarization in the United States. Since the turn of the current century, most of
polarization has been towards lower incomes. This result is striking and in
contrast with findings of other recent contributions. In addition, the paper finds
evidence that, after conditioning on income and household characteristics, the marginal
propensity to consume from permanent changes in income has somewhat fallen in
recent years. We assess the potential impacts of these trends on private
consumption. During
1998-2013, the rise in income polarization and lower marginal propensity to
consume have suppressed the level of real consumption at the aggregate level,
by about 3½ percent—equivalent to more than one year of consumption
Bruce Bower,
Science News: Big Viking families nurtured murder. Murder was a calculated family affair among Iceland’s
early Viking settlers. And the bigger the family, the more bloodthirsty. Data
from three family histories spanning six generations support the idea that
disparities in family size have long influenced who killed whom in small-scale
societies. These epic written stories, or sagas, record everything from births
and marriages to deals and feuds. Iceland’s Viking killers had on average of nearly three times as many
biological relatives and in-laws as their victims did, says a team led by
evolutionary psychologist Robin Dunbar of the University of Oxford. Prolific
killers responsible for five or more murders had the greatest advantage in kin
numbers.
Ben Bernanke,
Brookings: Modifying the Fed’s policy framework: Does a higher inflation target
beat negative interest rates? It would
be extremely helpful if central banks could count on other policymakers,
particularly fiscal policymakers, to take on some of the burden of stabilizing
the economy during the next recession. Since that can’t be assured, and since
the current low-interest-rate environment may persist, there are good reasons
for the Fed and other central bankers to consider changes in their policy
frameworks. The option of raising the inflation target should be part of that
discussion. But, as I have argued in this post, it is premature to rule out alternative or potentially
complementary approaches, including the possibility of using negative interest
rates.
Larry Summers, FT:
Building the case for greater infrastructure investment. The case for infrastructure investment has been
strong for a long time, but it gets stronger with each passing year, as
government borrowing costs decline and ongoing neglect raises the return on
incremental spending increases. As it becomes clearer that growth will not
return to pre-financial-crisis levels on its own, the urgency of policy action
rises. Just as the infrastructure failure at Chernobyl was a sign of malaise in
the Soviet Union’s last years, profound questions about America’s future are raised by collapsing
bridges, children losing IQ points because of lead in water and an air traffic
control system that does not use GPS technology.
John Lewis, BoE:
Robot Macroeconomics: What can theory and several centuries of economic history
teach us? On the plus side,
if you are worried about secular stagnation then robots offer you a couple of
reasons to be cheerful. First up, if robotisation does constitute a
major productivity gain that raises the marginal productivity of capital, then
this should push up on long run-equilibrium real rates, and hence ease fears of
secular stagnation. Second,
whilst economic theory usually assumes that technological growth means capital
is just costlessly melted down and made into newer, more productive machines,
in practice, some innovations might require scrapping of old capital, and hence
a wave of new investment.
Robert Rich,
Joseph Tracy, Ellen Fu; NY FED: U.S. Real Wage Growth: Slowing Down With Age. Life-cycle pattern of real wage growth is
characterized by high growth early in a worker’s career, little to no growth in
mid-career, and negative growth as workers near retirement. A growing fraction
of the U.S. adult population is transitioning into the flat to negative real
wage growth phases of their careers. Here, we turn our attention to estimating
the effect of this demographic shift on the economy-wide average real wage
growth rate. Our analysis shows that this economy-wide average real wage growth rate has declined by a third
since the mid-1980s.
The National
Academies of Science: The Economic and Fiscal Consequences of Immigration. The number of immigrants living in the United States
increased by more than 70 percent—from 24.5 million (about 9 percent of the
population) in 1995 to 42.3 million (about 13 percent of the population) in
2014. One set of headline questions concerns the economy, specifically jobs and
wages. Other questions arise about taxes and public spending. The literature on
employment impacts finds little evidence that immigration significantly affects
the overall employment levels of native-born workers. However, recent research
finds that immigration reduces the number of hours worked by native teens. There
is some evidence that recent immigrants reduce the employment rate of prior
immigrants. Cross-sectional data from 1994-2013 reveal that, at any given age,
the net fiscal contribution of adults in the first generation (and not
including costs or benefits generated by their dependents) was on average
consistently less favorable than that of the second and third-plus generations.
Viewed over a long time
horizon (75 years in our estimates), the fiscal impacts of immigrants are
generally positive at the federal level and negative at the state and local
levels.
Robert J. Shiller,
NYT: Today’s Inequality Could Easily Become Tomorrow’s Catastrophe. Truly extreme gaps in income and wealth could
arise from many causes. Consider just a few: Innovations in robotics and artificial intelligence, which
are already making many jobs uncompetitive, could lead us into a world in which
basic work with decent pay becomes impossible to find. An environmental
disaster like global warming, pollution or disease could sharply reduce the
ability of people of ordinary means to live in specific regions or entire
countries.
The Economist:
Post-truth politics. Art of the lie. That politicians sometimes peddle lies is not news. But post-truth
politics is more than just an invention of whingeing elites who have been
outflanked. The term picks
out the heart of what is new: that truth is not falsified, or contested, but of
secondary importance. Once, the purpose of political lying was to create
a false view of the world. The lies of men like Mr Trump do not work like that.
They are not intended to convince the elites, whom their target voters neither
trust nor like, but to reinforce prejudices. Feelings, not facts, are what
matter in this sort of campaigning.
Daily Mail: The
police dog that can sniff out child porn. Dog named Ruger can detect
a chemical found on flash drives or SD cards. This allows him to sniff
out stashes of electronics to bust pedophiles. The dogs are trained by
isolating the odor specific to these devices. Soon, he will join the K9 unit to
sniff out pedophiles for the Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force.
Martin Wolf, FT:
Monetary policy in a low-rate world. The first concerns what to do now. Above, I assumed that rates will
have risen substantially, before the next recession. Yet this is far more
likely if the economy is allowed to build up a substantial head of steam. Premature rises in interest
rates might trigger a sharper slowdown than people expect and put central banks
in the worst possible situation: tackling recession when rates remain extremely
low. For this reason, as Fed governor Lael Brainard argues, “the costs
to the economy of greater-than-expected strength in demand are likely to be
lower than the costs of significant unexpected weakness”. The riskier policy
is tightening policy too soon, not too late (Vi är många som inte har tillgång till ledande internationella
tidningar, inte ens på jobbet, här ett tips: Kopiera titeln och sök i Google,
klicka länken och ofta kan artikeln läsas utanför ”paywall”).
Robert J.
Samuelson, Washington Post: Are aging and the economic slowdown linked? An aging United States reduces the economy’s growth —
big time. That’s the startling conclusion of a new academic study, and if it
withstands scholarly scrutiny, it could transform our national political and
economic debate. We’ve known for decades, of course, that the retirement of the
huge baby-boom generation — coupled with low birthrates — would make the United
States an older society. But the study goes a giant step further, claiming that
the very fact that the
United States is an aging society weakens economic growth. “The fraction
of the United States population age 60 or over will increase by 21 percent
between 2010 and 2020,” says the study.
George J. Borjas,
Joan Monras, Harvard: The Labor Market Consequences of Refugee Supply Shocks. This paper revisits four historical refugee shocks to
document their labor market impact. We use a common empirical approach, derived
from factor demand theory, and publicly available data to measure the impact of
these shocks. Despite the differences in the political forces that motivated
the various flows, and in economic conditions across receiving countries, the
evidence reveals a common thread that confirms key insights of the canonical
model of a competitive labor market: Exogenous supply shocks adversely affect the labor market opportunities
of competing natives in the receiving countries, and often have a favorable
impact on complementary workers. In short, refugee flows can have large
distributional consequences.
Neil Irwin, NYT:
The Economic Expansion Is Helping the Middle Class, Finally. For years, the standard knock on this economic
expansion has been twofold: Growth has been slow, and big businesses and
wealthy investors have been its major beneficiaries, rather than middle-class
wage earners. And it has been a fair criticism. At least until recently. The
most decisive evidence of improving fortunes is found in new census data
released Tuesday showing that median household income rose a whopping 5.2 percent in 2015, to around
$56,500. According to that data, incomes rose for black families, white
families, Hispanic families and Asian-American families. It rose for
young people and in households headed by middle-aged adults and older people.
In short, the improvement was across the board to a remarkable degree.
Peter Cohen,
Robert Hahn, Jonathan Hall, Steven Levitt, Robert Metcalfe, NBER: Using Big
Data to Estimate Consumer Surplus: The Case of Uber. Estimating consumer surplus is challenging because it
requires identification of the entire demand curve. We rely on Uber’s “surge”
pricing algorithm and the richness of its individual level data to first
estimate demand elasticities at several points along the demand curve. We then
use these elasticity estimates to estimate consumer surplus. Using almost 50
million individual-level observations and a regression discontinuity design, we
estimate that in 2015 the UberX service generated about $2.9 billion in
consumer surplus in the four U.S. cities included in our analysis. For each
dollar spent by consumers, about $1.60 of consumer surplus is generated. Back-of-the-envelope
calculations suggest that the overall consumer surplus generated by the UberX
service in the United States in 2015 was $6.8 billion.
Robert H. Frank,
The Atlantic: Why Luck Matters More Than You Might Think. I have discovered that chance plays a far larger role
in life outcomes than most people realize. And yet, the luckiest among us appear especially unlikely
to appreciate our good fortune. People in higher income brackets are
much more likely than those with lower incomes to say that individuals get rich
primarily because they work hard. Other surveys bear this out: Wealthy people
overwhelmingly attribute their own success to hard work rather than to factors
like luck or being in the right place at the right time. When people see
themselves as self-made, they tend to be less generous and public-spirited.
Stijn Baert, Simon Amez, IZA: No Better Moment to
Score a Goal than Just Before Half Time? A Soccer Myth Statistically Tested. We test the soccer myth suggesting that a
particularly good moment to score a goal is just before half time. To this end,
rich data on 1,179 games played in the UEFA Champions League and UEFA Europa
League are analysed. In contrast to the myth, we find that, conditional on the
goal difference and other game characteristics at half time, the final goal difference at the
advantage of the home team is 0.520 goals lower in case of a goal just before
half time by this team. We show that this finding relates to this team's
lower probability of scoring a goal during the second half.
Michael Spence,
Project Syndicate: How to Fight Secular Stagnation. Much of the world, especially the advanced economies,
has been mired in a pattern of slow and declining GDP growth in recent years,
causing many to wonder whether this is becoming a semi-permanent condition – so-called “secular stagnation.”
The answer is probably yes, but the question lacks precision, and thus has
limited utility. There are, after all, different types of forces that
could be suppressing growth, not all of which are beyond our control.
Antonio Fatás,
Lawrence H. Summers, NBER:The Permanent Effects of Fiscal Consolidations. The global financial crisis has permanently lowered
the path of GDP in all advanced economies. At the same time, and in response to
rising government debt levels, many of these countries have been engaging in
fiscal consolidations that have had a negative impact on growth rates. We
empirically explore the connections between these two facts by extending to longer
horizons the methodology of Blanchard and Leigh (2013) regarding fiscal policy
multipliers. Our results
provide support for the presence of strong hysteresis effects of fiscal policy.
The large size of the effects points in the direction of self-defeating fiscal
consolidations as suggested by DeLong and Summers (2012). Attempts to
reduce debt via fiscal consolidations have very likely resulted in a higher
debt to GDP ratio through their long-term negative impact on output.
Thorvaldur
Gylfason, VOX: Economic performance in two dimensions: How Europe beats the US. One-dimensional indicators such as GNI per capita are
known to be flawed measures of wellbeing. The Human Development Index (HDI)
introduced dimensions of health and education alongside income. This column
argues that an HDI
adjusted for inequality and hours worked gives deeper insight into a country's
economic standing. Using this composite measure, the US falls from first to
seventh among G8 countries.
Eric D. Gould,
Alexander Hijzen, IMF: Growing Apart, Losing Trust? The Impact of Inequality on
Social Capital. There is a
widespread perception that trust and social capital have declined in United
States as well as other advanced economies, while income inequality has tended
to increase. While previous research has noted that measured trust declines as
individuals become less similar to one another, this paper examines whether the
downward trend in social capital is responding to the increasing gaps in
income. The analysis uses data from the American National Election Survey
(ANES) for the United States, and the European Social Survey (ESS) for Europe. The results provide robust
evidence that overall inequality lowers an individual’s sense of trust in
others in the United States as well as in other advanced economies.
These effects mainly stem from residual inequality, which may be more closely
associated with the notion of fairness, as well as inequality in the bottom of
the distribution. Since trust has been linked to economic growth and
development in the existing literature, these findings suggest an important,
indirect way through which inequality affects macro-economic performance.
Seth Gershenson,
Michael S. Hayes, IZA: Short-Run Externalities of Civic Unrest: Evidence from
Ferguson, Missouri. We document externalities
of the civic unrest experienced in Ferguson, MO following the police shooting
of an unarmed black teenager. Difference-in-differences and synthetic control
method estimates compare Ferguson-area schools to neighboring schools in the
greater St. Louis area and find that the unrest led to statistically significant, arguably causal declines
in students' math and reading achievement. Attendance is one mechanism
through which this effect operated, as chronic absence increased by five
percent in Ferguson-area schools. Impacts were concentrated in elementary
schools and at the bottom of the achievement distribution and spilled over into
majority black schools throughout the area.
Noah Smith,
Bloomberg: Data Geeks Are Taking Over Economics. So in recent years, many economists have been turning
to an alternative approach and chucking theory out the window entirely. Instead
of a complicated model about optimization and utility functions and blah blah
blah, just look for a case where some kind of random change in the economy -- a
so-called natural experiment -- offers a window into some important question.
For example, you could study a random influx of refugees to answer the question
of how immigration affects local labor markets. You don’t need a complicated
theory of how workers and companies behave -- all you need is a simple linear
model of how X affects Y. And so far, the revolution is winning. As economists
Matthew Panhans and John Singleton document in a recent paper, quasi-experimental techniques
are an increasingly large piece of academic publishing.
Shekhar Aiyar,
Christian Ebeke, Xiaobo Shao, IMF: The Euro Area Workforce is Aging, Costing
Growth. The euro area’s population is
expected to grow significantly older over the next couple of decades. This has
two components. First, the number of retirees is set to grow compared to the
people of working age (15–64) in the region. Second, and much less examined,
the average age of people within the labor force will rise: the share of
workers aged 55–64 is forecast to increase by a third, from 15 percent to 20
percent, over the next two decades. Aging will take a considerable toll on
productivity growth over the medium- to long-term. Average total factor
productivity growth in the euro area is forecast to be around 0.8 percent per
year. This could be higher by a quarter—that is to say, total factor
productivity could increase to about one percent per year—if we shut down the
effect of workforce aging. The burden of workforce aging will fall unequally
across euro area member states. Worryingly, some of the largest adverse effects
on productivity will fall on countries that can least afford it, such as Greece,
Spain, Portugal, and Italy.
David Halpern,
BoE: It’s time to bring more realistic models of human behaviour into economic
policy and regulation. Behaviour science
has had major impacts on policy in recent years. Introducing a more realistic
model of human behaviour – to replace the ‘rational’ utility-maximizer – has
enabled policymakers to boost savings; increase tax payments; encourage
healthier choices; reduce energy consumption; boost educational attendance;
reduce crime; and increase charitable giving. But there remain important areas
where its potential has yet to be realised, including macroeconomic policy and
large areas of regulatory practice. Businesses, consumers, and even regulators
are subject to similar systematic biases to other humans. These include overconfidence;
being overly influenced by what others are doing; and being influenced by
irrelevant information. The good news is that behavioural science offers the
prospect of helping regulators address some of their most pressing issues. This
includes: anticipating and addressing ‘animal spirits’ that drive bubbles or
sentiment-driven slowdowns; reducing corrupt market practices; and encouraging
financial products that are comprehensible to humans.
Rasmus Landersø,
James J. Heckman, NBER: The Scandinavian Fantasy: The Sources of
Intergenerational Mobility in Denmark and the U.S. This paper examines the sources of differences in
social mobility between the U.S. and Denmark. Measured by income mobility,
Denmark is a more mobile society, but not when measured by educational
mobility. There are pronounced nonlinearities in income and educational
mobility in both countries. Greater Danish income mobility is largely a
consequence of redistributional tax, transfer, and wage compression policies.
While Danish social policies for children produce more favorable cognitive test
scores for disadvantaged children, these do not translate into more favorable
educational outcomes, partly because of disincentives to acquire education
arising from the redistributional policies that increase income mobility.
Jeff Gou,
Washington Post: The clearest proof yet that your job is killing you. For decades now, the modern worker has been urged to
slow down, chill out, de-stress. Doctors link long
shifts and on-the-job anxiety to high blood pressure, heart disease, depression
and stroke. Yet, so far, the connection between job strain and bad health has
mostly been correlational. Recently, economists at Purdue and the University of
Copenhagen made a clever attempt to clear up the question. They looked at
Danish manufacturing companies where overseas sales increased unexpectedly
because of changes in foreign demand or transportation costs between 1996 and
2006. These constituted a set of natural experiments. At firms where exports
spiked, there was suddenly a lot more work to do, a lot more things to sell. Researchers
found that women at companies where there was an export boom were subsequently
more likely to be treated for severe depression, and more likely to take
prescription medication for heart attack or stroke. For both men and women,
there was also an increase in severe on-the-job injuries.
Roland G. Fryer,
Jr, NBER: An Empirical Analysis of Racial Differences in Police Use of Force. This paper explores racial differences in police use
of force. On non-lethal uses of force, blacks and Hispanics are more than fifty
percent more likely to experience some form of force in interactions with
police. Adding controls that account for important context and civilian
behavior reduces, but cannot fully explain, these disparities. On the most
extreme use of force – officer-involved shootings – we find no racial
differences in either the raw data or when contextual factors are taken into
account. We argue that the patterns in the data are consistent with a model in
which police officers are utility maximizers, a fraction of which have a
preference for discrimination, who incur relatively high expected costs of
officer-involved shootings.
Bjorn Lomborg, US
Today: Organic food is great business, but a bad investment. An organic label sends our skepticism and good sense
out the window. Consumers in one study were given two sets of absolutely
identical food items, with one set marked “organic” and one not. They declared
the food they believed to be “organic” to be lower in calories and more
nutritious, and were willing to pay 16% to 23% more. It’s called the “health
halo” effect. Organic food has become the fastest-growing sector of the U.S.
food industry, with sales that increase by double digits annually. But organics are not better for
your health, worse for nature and the planet, and terrible for the world’s
poor. What it boils down to is the world’s richest people spending their cash
to support less efficient farming practices, to feel better about their
choices.