Elva Bova, Tidiane Kinda, Jaejoon Woo, VOX: Austerity
and inequality: The size and composition of fiscal adjustment matter. Understanding the
distributional consequences of fiscal adjustment measures is important for
equity, but also to ensure the sustainability of the measures. This column
shows that fiscal
adjustments increase inequality, including through unemployment. Spending-based
adjustments worsen inequality more significantly than tax-based adjustments.
Progressive taxation and targeted social benefits and subsidies introduced in
the context of a broader decline in spending can help offset some of the
distributional impact of fiscal adjustments.
Camille Landais, Arash Nekoei, J Peter Nilsson, David
Seim, Johannes Spinnewijn, VOX: Unemployment insurance and adverse selection:
Evidence from Sweden. Unemployment
insurance is compulsory in almost all countries, with no choice for workers
over the level of coverage. But why restrict choice if it can improve the
targeting of individuals who value the insurance the most? This column uses
evidence from Sweden to examine whether the issue of adverse selection
justifies a universal mandate for unemployment insurance. Workers who purchased more
generous unemployment insurance were more than twice as likely to be unemployed
in the following year. A universal mandate combats such adverse selection, but
forces workers to buy insurance even when insurance costs are higher than the
value they assign to it.
Kenneth Rogoff, Project Syndicate: When Will Tech
Disrupt Higher Education? Universities pride
themselves on producing creative ideas that disrupt the rest of society, yet
higher-education teaching techniques continue to evolve at a glacial pace. Given education’s centrality to
raising productivity, shouldn’t efforts to reinvigorate today’s sclerotic
Western economies focus on how to reinvent higher education? Universities
and colleges are pivotal to the future of our societies. But, given impressive
and ongoing advances in technology and artificial intelligence, it is hard to
see how they can continue playing this role without reinventing themselves over
the next two decades.
Cody Cook, Rebecca Diamond, Jonathan Hall, John A.
List, Paul Oyer, Stanford: The Gender Earnings Gap in the Gig Economy: Evidence
from over a Million Rideshare Drivers. The growth of
the "gig" economy generates worker flexibility that, some have
speculated, will favor women. We explore one facet of the gig economy by
examining labor supply choices and earnings among more than a million rideshare
drivers on Uber in the U.S. Perhaps most surprisingly, we find that there is a
roughly 7% gender earnings gap amongst drivers. The uniqueness of our
data—knowing exactly the production and compensation functions—permits us to
completely unpack the underlying determinants of the gender earnings gap. We
find that the entire gender gap is caused by three factors: experience on the
platform (learning-by-doing), preferences over where/when to work, and
preferences for driving speed. Overall, our results suggest that, even in the gender-blind,
transactional, flexible environment of the gig economy, gender-based
preferences (especially the value of time not spent at paid work and, for drivers, preferences for driving
speed) can open gender earnings gaps. The preference differences that
contribute to pay differences in professional markets for lawyers and MBA’s
also lead to earnings gaps for drivers
on Uber, suggesting they are pervasive across the skill distribution and whether in the traditional or gig
workplace.
Yann Bramoulléa, Lorenzo Ductor, Journal of Economic
Behavior & Organization: Title length. We document strong and robust
negative correlations between the length of the title of an economics article
and different measures of scientific quality. Analyzing all articles
published between 1970 and 2011 and referenced in EconLit, we find that
articles with shorter titles tend to be published in better journals, to be
more cited and to be more innovative. These correlations hold controlling for
unobserved time-invariant and observed time-varying characteristics of teams of
authors.
Manon K. Schweinfurth, Michael Tabo, Current Biology: Reciprocal
Trading of Different Commodities in Norway Rats. The prevalence of reciprocal cooperation in non-human
animals is hotly debated. Part of this dispute rests on the assumption that
reciprocity means paying like with like. However, exchanges between social
partners may involve different commodities and services. Hitherto, there is no
experimental evidence that animals other than primates exchange different
commodities among conspecifics based on the decision rules of direct
reciprocity. Here, we show
that Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) apply direct reciprocity rules when
exchanging two different social services: food provisioning and allogrooming.
Focal rats were made to experience partners either cooperating or
non-cooperating in one of the two commodities. Afterward, they had the
opportunity to reciprocate favors by the alternative service. Test rats traded
allogrooming against food provisioning, and vice versa, thereby acting by the
rules of direct reciprocity. This might indicate that reciprocal altruism among
non-human animals is much more widespread than currently assumed.
No comments:
Post a Comment