Richard
Freeman et al, Center for American progress: Bargaining for the American Dream.
What Unions do for Mobility. Areas with higher union membership demonstrate more mobility for
lowincome children. Using Chetty and others’ data, we find that low-income children
rise higher in the income rankings when they grow up in areas with high-union
membership. A 10 percentage point increase in a geographic area’s union
membership is associated with low-income children ranking 1.3 percentile points
higher in the national income distribution. This relationship between unions
and the mobility of low-income children is at least as strong as the
relationship between mobility and high school dropout rates—a factor that is
generally recognized as one of the most important correlates of economic mobility.
Indeed, union density is one of the strongest predictors of an area’s mobility.
David
Autor, NBER: Polanyi's Paradox and the Shape of Employment Growth. I begin by sketching the historical thinking about
machine displacement of human labor, and then consider the contemporary
incarnation of this displacement--labor market polarization, meaning the
simultaneous growth of high-education, high-wage and low-education, low-wages
jobs--a manifestation of Polanyi's paradox. I discuss both the explanatory
power of the polarization phenomenon and some key puzzles that confront it. I
then reflect on how recent advances in artificial intelligence and robotics
should shape our thinking about the likely trajectory of occupational change
and employment growth. A key observation of the paper is that journalists and
expert commentators overstate the extent of machine substitution for human
labor and ignore the strong complementarities. The challenges to substituting
machines for workers in tasks requiring adaptability, common sense, and
creativity remain immense. Contemporary computer science seeks to overcome
Polanyi's paradox by building machines that learn from human examples, thus
inferring the rules that we tacitly apply but do not explicitly understand. David Autor: Automation – opportunities and challenges
(video).
Guy
Michaels, Georg Graetz, VOX: Estimating the impact of robots on productivity
and employment.
Robots may be dangerous not only to the action heroes of cinema, but also to
the average manufacturing worker. This column analyses the effect robots have
had in 14 industries across 17 developed countries from 1993 to 2007.
Industrial robots increase labour productivity, total factor productivity, and
wages. While they don’t significantly change total hours worked, they may be a
threat to low- and middle-skilled workers.
William
D. Nordhaus, NBER: Are We Approaching an Economic Singularity? Information
Technology and the Future of Economic Growth. What are the prospects for long-run economic growth?
The present study looks at a recently launched hypothesis, which I label
Singularity. The idea here is that rapid growth in computation and artificial
intelligence will cross some boundary or Singularity after which economic
growth will accelerate sharply as an ever-accelerating pace of improvements
cascade through the economy. The paper develops a growth model that features
Singularity and presents several tests of whether we are rapidly approaching
Singularity. The key question for Singularity is the substitutability between
information and conventional inputs. The tests suggest that the Singularity is
not near.
Claire
Cain Miller, The Upshot: Restaurant of the Future? Service With an Impersonal
Touch. At this
restaurant, customers order, pay and receive their food and never interact with
a person. The restaurant, Eatsa, the first outlet in a company with national
ambitions, is almost fully automated. There are no waiters or even an order
taker behind a counter. There is no counter. There are unseen people helping to
prepare the food, but there are plans to fully automate that process, too, if
it can be done less expensively than employing people.
Francisco
J. Buera, Joseph P. Kaboski, Richard Rogerson, NBER: Skill Biased Structural
Change. We document
for a broad panel of advanced economies that increases in GDP per capita are
associated with a shift in the composition of value added to sectors that are
intensive in high-skill labor. It follows that further development in these
economies leads to an increase in the relative demand for skilled labor. We
develop a two-sector model of this process and use it to assess the
contribution of this process of skill-biased structural change to the rise of
the skill premium in the US, and a broad panel of advanced economies, over the
period 1977 to 2005. We find that these compositional demands account for
between 25 and 30% of the overall increase of the skill premium due to
technical change.
Roland Fryer: Understanding
the Sources of Inequality in Schools, Health Care, and Environment. Roland Fryer of Harvard University and the NBER,
winner of this year’s John Bates Clark Medal for outstanding work by a young
economist, outlines some of the important sources of inequality and key
questions driving economic analysis of the phenomenon.
Lyndsey
Pereira-Brereton. BoE: Izzy Whizzy let’s get Vizzy – The magic of using
visualisation to analyse and understand data. This blog draws on some examples to highlight how
different visualisation techniques help not only the communication of data, but
more importantly, how it can aid data exploration, analysis and understanding. Visualisation
is a powerful technique because our brains are naturally wired to process
information visually. One of the best examples of this power is Anscombe’s
Quartet, which comprises of 4 sets of data that have the same mean, variance,
correlation, and linear regression. However, it is only when they are graphed
that we immediately see very different patterns, and therefore interpretations,
of the data:
Sara
G. Miller, Livescience: The Best Country to Live in If You're Over 60. According to the Global Age Watch Index 2015, which
measures the social and economic wellbeing of older people across the globe,
Switzerland ranks as the No. 1 country in the world to live for older people.
Norway and Sweden came in second and third, respectively. The U.S. managed to
snag a spot in the top 10, coming in at No. 9, according to the report.
No comments:
Post a Comment