Friday, September 25, 2015

SEPTEMBER 25 2015

Thomas A. Lubik and Christian Matthes, Richmond FED:  Calculating the Natural Rate of Interest: A Comparison of Two Alternative Approaches. The natural rate of interest is a key concept in monetary economics because its level relative to the real rate of interest allows economists to assess the stance of monetary policy. However, the natural rate cannot be observed; it must be calculated using identifying assumptions. This Economic Brief compares the popular Laubach-Williams approach to calculating the natural rate with an alternative method that imposes fewer theoretical restrictions. Both approaches indicate that the natural rate has been above the real rate for a long time.

Lennart Flood, Ekonomisk Debatt: Skatter räknas, räkna med skatter. Sverige har en mycket hög högsta nivå på beskattningen av förvärvsinkomster. Det finns flera skäl till att denna skatt bör sänkas. Teorin om en optimal inkomstbeskattning stödjer en skatteprofil utan progressiva inslag. Det empiriska underlaget visar, trots stora variationer, att skatter påverkar våra val och att dessa val sträcker sig långt utanför valet av arbetstid. Det är väsentligt att framhålla betydelsen av att göra konsekvensanalyser av skatte- och bidragsreformer. Vid dessa utvärderingar bör strukturella modeller spela en väsentlig roll.
Brookings: The power of the nudge: Policy lessons from behavioral economics. Research is proliferating in behavioral economics, a field at the intersection of psychology and economics which tries to study how people actually behave, as opposed to the way they are assumed to behave in economists’ abstract models. This work has developed new and effective policies across many areas, from encouraging people to save for retirement to discouraging them from smoking. On September 18, the Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy at Brookings explored lessons from behavioral economics for fiscal and monetary policy with leading scholars in the field, who shared their findings and suggestions for policy.
Henk-Wim de Boer, Egbert L. W. Jongen, Jan Kabátek, IZA: The Effectiveness of Fiscal Stimuli for Working Parents. To promote the labor participation of parents with young children, governments employ a number of fiscal instruments. Prominent examples are childcare subsidies and in-work benefits. However, which policy works best for employment is largely unknown. We study the effectiveness of different fiscal stimuli in an empirical model of household labor supply and childcare use. We use a large and rich administrative data set for the Netherlands. Large-scale reforms in childcare subsidies and in-work benefits in the data period facilitate the identification of the structural parameters. We find that an in-work benefit for secondary earners that increases with income is the most effective way to stimulate total hours worked. Childcare subsidies are less effective, as substitution of other types of care for formal care drives up public expenditures. In-work benefits that target both primary and secondary earners are much less effective, because primary earners are rather unresponsive to financial incentives.
Guillermo Montt, OECD: How the Labour Market Drives Mismatch and its Penalties. Results from the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC) (2015) show that the more a field is saturated – when the supply of graduates exceeds the demand by firms – the more it forces its graduates to seek work in another field, and the more it forces them to work at a level for which they are over-qualified. The more a field is saturated, the more likely its graduates will receive an important wage penalty. Results also show that workers benefit when the skills they have earned are transferable to other sectors as they can put a larger part of their skill set to use when in other sectors. These workers are more likely to work in another field at the corresponding qualifications level; they do not experience a wage penalty.
Committee on the Long-Run Macroeconomic Effects of the Aging U.S. Population: The Growing Gap in Life Expectancy by Income:  Implications for Federal Programs and Policy Responses.. To evaluate the effect of the widening life-span gap on benefits received from Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, the committee simulated the levels of benefits received by a generation with the lifespans of those born in 1930 and compared them with the benefits received by a generation with the lifespans of those born in 1960. (The simulation kept all other characteristics across the groups the same, except for health and mortality.) The simulation found that for men born in 1930, lifetime entitlement benefits received after age 50 are roughly similar across income groups.  Even among those born in 1930, high earners had longer life spans, so they tend to receive more from Social Security, while lower earners receive more on average from Medicaid, disability insurance, and Supplemental Security Income.  For men born in 1960, however, high earners are projected to receive markedly more -- $132,000 more -- in lifetime benefits from entitlement programs than is projected for men in the bottom earnings category. 
Nicholas W. Papageorge Victor Ronda Yu Zhengx, JHU: The Economic Value of Breaking Bad: Misbehavior, Schooling and the Labor Market. Prevailing research argues that childhood misbehavior in the classroom is bad for schooling and, presumably, bad overall. In contrast, we argue that childhood misbehavior captures underlying non-cognitive skills that are potentially valuable in the labor market. We follow work from psychology and summarize observed classroom misbehavior as two underlying latent factors. Next, we estimate a model of education decisions and labor market outcomes, allowing the impact of each of these two factors to vary by outcome. We show the first evidence that one of the factors driving childhood misbehavior, discussed in psychological literature as externalizing behavior (and linked, for example, to aggression), does indeed reduce educational attainment, but also increases earnings. This finding highlights a broader point: non-cognitive skills are not well summarized as a one-dimensional object that is either good or bad per se. Using the estimated model, we assess competing pedagogical policies. We find that policies aimed at eliminating externalizing behavior increase schooling attainment, but also reduce earnings. In comparison, policies that decrease the schooling penalty of externalizing behavior increase both schooling and earnings.

No comments:

Post a Comment