Anna Orlovskaya,
Conor Sewell, BoE: Peer to Peer – Scale and Scalability. Peer to Peer (P2P) lending is a hot topic at Fintech
events and has received a lot of attention from academia, journalists, various
international bodies and regulators.
Following the Financial Crisis, P2P platforms saw an opportunity to fill
a gap in the market by offering finance to customers and businesses struggling
to get loans from banks. Whilst some argue they will one
day revolutionise the whole banking landscape, many platforms have not yet
turned a profit. So before asking if
they are the future, we should first ask if they have a future at all.
Problems such as a higher cost of funds, or limited ability to scale the
business, may mean the only viable path is to become more like traditional
banks.
Sendhil
Mullainathan, NYT: The Hidden Taxes on Women. The working world is unfair to many women, yet even when they succeed,
they must confront another series of challenges. Their hard-won successes are
taxed in ways that men’s are not. The taxes I’m talking about aren’t paid in
dollars and cents or imposed by the government. They take the form of annoyance
and misery and are levied by individuals, very often by loved ones. Winning an election increases
subsequent divorce rates for female candidates but not for men (This paper,
like most of the social science literature, focuses on female-male partners.)
These divorces are not the exclusive result of hard-fought campaigns.
The study examined elections with very narrow margins of victories, in which
winning was largely a matter of luck. These “lucky” winners also experienced
higher divorce rates. Corporate success has similar consequences: Women who
become chief executives divorce at higher rates than others.
Angus Deaton,
NBER: What do Self-Reports of Wellbeing Say about Life-Cycle Theory and Policy? I respond to Atkinson's plea to revive welfare
economics, and to considering alternative ethical frameworks when making policy
recommendations. I examine a measure of self-reported evaluative wellbeing, the
Cantril Ladder, and use data from Gallup to examine wellbeing over the
life-cycle. I assess the
validity of the measure, and show that it is hard to reconcile with familiar
theories of intertemporal choice. I find a worldwide optimism about the future;
in spite of repeated evidence to the contrary, people consistently but
irrationally predict they will be better off five years from now. The
gap between future and current wellbeing diminishes with age, and in rich
countries, is negative among the elderly. I also use the measure to think about
income transfers by age and sex. Policies that give priority those with low
incomes favor the young and the old, while utilitarian policies favor the
middle aged, and men over women.
Erika Check
Hayden, Nature: Colossal family tree reveals environment’s influence on
lifespan. Computational biologist Yaniv
Erlich of Columbia University in New York City and his colleagues have used
crowdsourced data to make a family tree that links 13 million people. The ancestry
chart, described today in Science, is believed to be the largest verified
resource of its kind — spanning an average of 11 generations. Erlich’s team analysed the birth and death
dates of the people in this tree, and calculated whether individuals were more
likely to have died at similar ages if they were closely related. The group
concludes that heredity explains only about 16% of the difference in lifespans
for these individuals. Most of the differences were down to other factors, such
as where and how people lived.
Tim Harford, The
Undercover Economist: Like great coffee, good ideas take time to percolate. Monmouth Coffee opened on Monmouth Street in London
in 1978. It serves wonderful coffee and the queues often stretch out of the
door. That is what makes what happened next so surprising. What happened next
was: nothing. Data show that just because good ideas emerge does not mean that
they spread quickly. Researchers at the OECD have concluded that within most sectors (for
example, coal mining or food retail) there is a large and rising gap in productivity
between the typical business and the 100 leading companies in the sector. The
leading businesses are nearly 15 times more productive per worker, and almost
five times more productive even after adjusting for their use of capital such
as buildings, computers and machinery.
Jared A.
Forrester, Thomas G. Weiser, Wilderness & Environmental Medicine: An Update
on Fatalities Due to Venomous and Nonvenomous Animals in the United States
(2008–2015). The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research
database was queried to return all animal-related fatalities between 2008 and
2015. There were 1610 animal-related fatalities, with the majority from
nonvenomous animals (2.8 deaths per 10 million persons). The largest proportion
of animal-related fatalities was due to “other mammals,” largely composed of
horses and cattle. Deaths attributable to Hymenoptera (hornets, wasps, and bees)
account for 29.7% of the overall animal-related fatalities and have been steady
over the last 20 years. Dog-related
fatality frequencies are stable, although the fatality frequency of 4.6 deaths
per 10 million persons among children 4 years of age or younger was nearly
4-fold greater than in the other age groups. Appropriate education and
prevention measures aimed at decreasing injury from animals should be directed
at the high-risk groups of agricultural workers and young children with dogs.
No comments:
Post a Comment