Wednesday, September 13, 2017

JUNE 8 2017

Cecchetti & Schoenholtz, Banking&Finance: Labor's Declining Share: A Primer. Does the global decline in labor’s share in recent decades reflect a general shift of activity away from industries or sectors that have higher labor shares? The answer generally is no. Conventional analysis of the data shows that most of the decline occurs within-industry or within-sector, rather than resulting from a compositional shift of activity. So, after decades of apparent stability, what has been causing the recent decline of the aggregate labor share? Will the decline continue? And how is it affecting welfare? A truly compelling explanation (and prediction) must be consistent with the timing of the measured decline (especially the larger drop in the past two decades), with its geographic breadth (including both advanced and emerging economies), with its sectoral and geographic diversity, and with the within-industry pattern observed. This is a very tall challenge to which researchers are beginning to respond.

Nicholas Bloom, Erik Brynjolfsson et al. IZA: What Drives Differences in Management?  Partnering with the Census we implement a new survey of "structured" management practices in 32,000 US manufacturing plants. We find an enormous dispersion of management practices across plants, with 40% of this variation across plants within the same firm. This management variation accounts for about a fifth of the spread of productivity, a similar fraction as that accounted for by R&D, and twice as much as explained by IT. We find evidence for four "drivers" of management: competition, business environment, learning spillovers and human capital. Collectively, these drivers account for about a third of the dispersion of structured management practices.
Derek Thompson, The Atlantic: So, Where Are All Those Robots? Lots of people think that the robots are coming to steal everybody’s jobs. But another story is emerging from several recent papers and columns by economists and economic writers. Instead of a world without work, they say, there is currently more evidence for a world with too much work—and not enough humans to do it all. Rather than high-flying investment in machines and similarly high unemployment, there is strangely low investment and happily low joblessness. How can anybody say robots are killing jobs when the killer is nowhere to be seen and the supposed victim isn’t even dead?

Jonathan M.V. Davis, Sara B. Heller, NBER: Rethinking the Benefits of Youth Employment Programs: The Heterogeneous Effects of Summer Jobs. This paper reports the results of two randomized field experiments, each offering different populations of youth a supported summer job in Chicago. In both experiments, the program dramatically reduces violent-crime arrests, even after the summer. It does so without improving employment, schooling, or other types of crime; if anything, property crime increases over 2-3 post-program years. To explore mechanisms, we implement a machine learning method that predicts treatment heterogeneity using observables. The method identifies a subgroup of youth with positive employment impacts, whose characteristics differ from the disconnected youth served in most employment programs. We find that employment benefiters commit more property crime than their control counterparts, and non-benefiters also show a decline in violent crime.
Erling Barth, Sari Pekkala Kerr, Claudia Olivetti, NBER: The Dynamics of Gender Earnings Differentials: Evidence from Establishment Data. We use a unique match between the 2000 Decennial Census of the United States and the Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics (LEHD) data to analyze how much of the increase in the gender earnings gap over the lifecycle comes from shifts in the sorting of men and women across high- and low-pay establishments and how much is due to differential earnings growth within establishments. We find that for the college educated the increase is substantial and, for the most part, due to differential earnings growth within establishment by gender. The between component is also important. Differential mobility between establishments by gender can explain 27 percent of the widening of the pay gap for this group. For those with no college, the, relatively small, increase of the gender gap over the lifecycle can be fully explained by differential moves by gender across establishments. The evidence suggests that, for both education groups, the between-establishment component of the increasing wage gap is due almost entirely to those who are married.

David Autor, Andreas Ravndal Kostol, Magne Mogstad, Bradley Setzler, NBER: Disability Benefits, Consumption Insurance, and Household Labor Supply.We comprehensively assess these missing margins in the context of Norway's DI system, drawing on two strengths of the Norwegian environment. First, Norwegian register data allow us to characterize the household impacts and fiscal costs of disability receipt by linking employment, taxation, benefits receipt, and assets at the person and household level. Second, random assignment of DI applicants to Norwegian judges who differ systematically in their leniency allows us to recover the causal effects of DI allowance on individuals at the margin of program entry. Accounting for the total effect of DI allowances on both household labor supply and net payments across all public transfer programs substantially alters our picture of the consumption benefits and fiscal costs of disability receipt. While DI allowance causes a significant increase in household income and consumption on average, it has little impact on income or consumption of married applicants because spousal earnings responses (via the added worker effect) and benefit substitution entirely offset DI benefit payments among those who are allowed relative to those who are denied.
Yannis Paschalidis, Harvard Business Review: How Machine Learning Is Helping Us Predict Heart Disease and Diabetes. In an ongoing effort with Boston-area hospitals, including the Boston Medical Center and the Brigham and Women’s Hospital, we found that we could predict hospitalizations due to these two chronic diseases about a year in advance with an accuracy rate of as much as 82%. This will give care providers the chance to intervene much earlier and head off hospitalizations. Our team is also working with the Department of Surgery at the Boston Medical Center and can predict readmissions within 30 days of general surgery; the hope is to guide postoperative care in order to prevent them.

No comments:

Post a Comment