Andreas Lichter,
IZA: Benefit Duration and Job Search Effort: Evidence from a Natural
Experiment. The results of this study
provide substantial
support for strategic job search behavior in response to the generosity of the
benefit scheme: the extension of the benefit duration caused job search effort
to significantly decrease, lowering the number of filed applications and the
probability of applying for a job that requires moving. In line with
theory, it is shown that the reduction in search effort is accompanied by a
significant decrease in the short-run job-finding rate. Instrumental variables
estimates further provide causal evidence on the direct relationship between
search effort and unemployment duration: a 10 percent increase in the number of
filed job applications is found to increase the short-run job-finding
probability by 1.3 percentage points.
Edwin Leuven,
Sturla Andreas Løkken, IZA: Long Term Impacts of Class Size in Compulsory
School. How does class size in
compulsory school affect peoples' long run education and earnings? We use
maximum class size rules and Norwegian administrative registries allowing us to
observe outcomes up to age 48. We do not find any indication of beneficial effects of class size
reduction in compulsory school. For a 1 person reduction in class size
we can rule out effects on income as small as 0.087 percent in primary school
and 0.12 percent in middle school. Population differences in parental
background, school size or competitive pressure do not appear to reconcile our
findings with previous studies.
Fatih Guvenen, Greg Kaplan, University of Chicago: Top Income
Inequality in the 21st Century: Some Cautionary Notes. Since 2000, different measures of top income
inequality have exhibited very different trends. Top income shares based on
measures of total income show a continued rise, whereas top income shares based
on wage and salary income show no increase in inequality post-2000. The most
important difference between these two measures of income is the income that
accrues to S-corporations…But interpreting trends in the S-corporation
component is extremely difficult. Feenberg and Poterba (1993), Gordon and
Slemrod (2002), and Cooper et al. (2016) warn that much of the recent increase
in S-corporation income is income that previously accrued to C-corporations. Such income is not “new”
income earned by top earners but is simply income that was previously labeled
as corporate income rather than household income.
Jon Kleinberg,
NBER: Human Decisions and Machine Predictions. We examine how machine learning can be used to improve and understand
human decision-making. We focus on when judges must decide where defendants
will await trial—at home or in jail. Our results suggest potentially large welfare gains: a policy
simulation shows crime can be reduced by up to 24.8% with no change in jailing
rates, or jail populations can be reduced by 42.0% with no increase in crime
rates. Moreover, we see reductions in all categories of crime, including
violent ones. Importantly, such gains can be had while also significantly
reducing the percentage of African-Americans and Hispanics in jail. We find
similar results in a national dataset as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment