Olivier
Armantier, Wilbert van der Klaauw, Giorgio Topa, and Basit Zafar, FED New York:
Who is Driving the Recent Decline in Consumer Inflation Expectations? Is the individual decline in expectations driven by a
specific demographic group? In the right panel of the table above we report the
difference in a given respondent’s expectations between June and October 2015
for various demographic groups. Although there are small differences across
groups, the difference is negative for all groups, and the difference is not
substantial across groups. This panel analysis therefore reinforces our
previous conclusion that the recent decline in inflation expectations is fairly
homogenous across demographic groups.
Joshua
Angrist et al, NBER: Leveling Up: Early Results from a Randomized Evaluation of
Post-Secondary Aid.
Our research design answers the challenges of aid evaluation with random
assignment of aid offers and a strong first stage for aid received: randomly
assigned aid offers increased aid received markedly. This in turn appears to
have boosted enrollment and persistence, while also shifting many applicants
from two- to four-year schools. Awards offered to nonwhite applicants, to those
with relatively low academic achievement, and to applicants who targeted
less-selective four-year programs (as measured by admissions rates) generated
the largest gains in enrollment and persistence, while effects were much
smaller for applicants predicted to have stronger post-secondary outcomes in
the absence of treatment. Thus, awards enabled groups with historically-low
college attendance to ʽlevel up,ʼ largely equalizing enrollment and persistence
rates with traditionally college-bound peers, particularly at four-year
programs.
Paul
Graham: Economic Inequality. Lots of people talk about economic inequality. Nearly all say it is
bad if economic inequality increases, and that it would be better if it
decreased. But economic inequality per se is not bad. It has multiple causes.
Many are bad, but some are good. For example, high incarceration rates and tax
loopholes are bad things that increase economic inequality. But startups also
increase economic inequality. A founder whose startup succeeds will end up with
stock worth a lot of money. And unlike high incarceration rates and tax
loopholes, startups are on the whole good. Since economic inequality per se is
not bad, we should not attack it. Instead we should attack the bad things that
cause it. For example, instead of attacking economic inequality, we should
attack poverty.
Philippe
Aghion et al, Harvard University: Innovation and Top Income Inequality. In this paper we use cross-state panel data to show
a positive and significant correlation between various measures of
innovativeness and top income inequality in the United States over the past
decades. Two distinct instrumentation strategies suggest that this correlation
(partly) reflects a causality from innovativeness to top income inequality, and
the effect is significant: for example, when measured by the number of patent
per capita, innovativeness accounts on average across US states for around 17%
of the total increase in the top 1% income share between 1975 and 2010. Yet, innovation
does not appear to increase other measures of inequality which do not focus on
top incomes.
Nelson
D. Schwartzjan, NYT: Economists Take Aim at Wealth Inequality. While the much-talked-about 1 percent is doing just
fine, the supersize gains are taking place even further up the income ladder,
according to what Mr. Bloom and four colleagues found by examining 35 years of
data from the Social Security Administration. The phenomenon is not limited to
Wall Street or the big banks — manufacturers rewarded their top executives
every bit as generously as did firms in the finance, insurance and real estate
sectors. And this pattern is being repeated in countries where the political
landscape is quite different from that of the United States, like Sweden,
Germany and Britain.
Timothy
J. Hatton, University of Essex: Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Policy in OECD
Countries. There are
no easy solutions to the refugee crisis, and I think by now we all understand
that. We could do better. Making life miserable for asylum applicants is not
really going to do very much to stop them coming,” he said. “It’s not a
deterrent, so let’s put more effort into and resources into refugee welfare and
to integration policies for those that are accepted. And, in fact, many
countries have been doing that for the last 10, 15 years.
Susan
F. Martin, Donald G. Herzberg Professor of International Migration: Rethinking
Protection of those Displaced by Humanitarian Crises. Many millions more are displaced each year and
cumulatively from a much broader range of life-threatening humanitarian crises
than captured by UNHCR’s figures. An average of 26.4 million were displaced
annually by acute natural hazards since 2008 and an unknown but sizeable number
from gang and cartel violence, electoral and communal violence, nuclear and
industrial accidents, and a range of other human made disasters. This paper
argues for new legal, institutional and operational frameworks to more
effectively address the situation of the totality of displaced persons.
Jeffrey
D. Sachs, Earth Institute: Towards an International Migration Regime. Few if any issues in public policy are as muddled and
contentious as international migration. There is no international regime that
establishes standards and principles for national migration policies other than
in the case of refugees (migrants escaping persecution). My aim here is to
describe some economic and ethical principles that may underpin an
international migration regime.
No comments:
Post a Comment