Thursday, January 21, 2016

DECEMBER 18 2015

Sumit Agarwal et al, NBER: Do Banks Pass Through Credit Expansions? The Marginal Profitability of Consumer Lending During the Great Recession. We examine the ability of policymakers to stimulate household borrowing and spending during the Great Recession by reducing banks’ cost of funds. Using panel data on 8.5 million U.S. credit card accounts and 743 credit limit regression discontinuities, we estimate the marginal propensity to borrow (MPB) for households with different FICO credit scores. We find substantial heterogeneity, with a $1 increase in credit limits raising total unsecured borrowing after 12 months by 59 cents for consumers with the lowest FICO scores (≤ 660) while having no effect on consumers with the highest FICO scores (> 740). We estimate that a 1 percentage point reduction in the cost of funds raises optimal credit limits by $127 for consumers with FICO scores below 660 versus $2,203 for consumers with FICO scores above 740. We conclude that banks’ MPL is lowest exactly for those households with the highest MPB, limiting the effectiveness of policies that aim to stimulate the economy by reducing banks’ cost of funds.

Neil Irwin, NYT: Why Negative Interest Rates Are Becoming the New Normal. What we’re learning from Europe about negative rates and the nonexistence of the zero lower bound is an exemplar for a lot of monetary experimentation over the last six years. Tools that existed as academic thought experiments a decade ago are now becoming standard-issue parts of the central banks’ policy tool kit. Strategies tried briefly by small countries like Denmark are embraced by the giants of the world economy. It’s just too bad we had to learn these lessons the hard way — through years upon years of trial and error, with lots of economic suffering along the way.
Bradley Speigner, BoE: Finding a Match. Is falling unemployment masking a broader deterioration in UK labour market performance? The ease with which a typical job seeker lands a job is a crucial indicator of the health of the labour market, which cannot be fully inferred from just a casual glance at the headline unemployment rate. It is true that unemployment has declined quite rapidly recently. But this is because job openings have been unusually abundant while the labour market’s capacity to match individual workers to available jobs quickly has actually worsened. This capacity is referred to as matching efficiency, and it started falling in the UK even before the 2008 recession.

Krishna Regmi, Georgia College & State University: Examining the Externality of Social Insurance: Unemployment Insurance and Children's Educational Achievements. Exploiting the large variation in the generosity of unemployment insurance (UI) benefits across states and over time in the U.S., this paper investigates the link between UI and children's academic outcomes. I use data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) and the Current Population Survey (CPS), and create two separate measures of academic outcomes: grade repetition, and high-school dropout status, respectively. My estimates from the SIPP data show that a one percent increase in maximum UI benefits decreases the probability of a child's grade repetition by about 0.0005 percentage points, which is approximately 1.41 percent. Empirical finding from the CPS data is that a one percent increase in maximum benefits reduces the probability that a student drops out of high school by around 0.0018 percentage points, about 0.89 percent. This paper's findings, which are the first in the literature to show evidence of a positive effect of UI on children's educational outcomes, help us to understand the role of UI in the human capital accumulation of children, and thus to devise an optimal level of UI.
Eduardo Porter, NYT: For Immigrants, America Is Still More Welcoming Than Europe. So why is it that immigrants in the United States — including those here illegally — have managed to integrate far more successfully into the American economy and social fabric than foreigners arriving to the relatively coddled states of the European Union, where they often enjoy access right away to a panoply of rights and benefits? The difference is worth pondering. More immigrants buy into the American dream than do native-born Americans. The employment rate of immigrants is higher than that of natives. One in four of the economically active is out of work in France and one in three in Belgium and Sweden. And these poor employment prospects persist down the generations. Youth joblessness among the European-born children of immigrants is almost 50 percent higher than for those with native-born parents. Employment is not the only barrier. Children from less-educated immigrant families are much less likely to succeed at school in Europe than the sons and daughters of natives, and much more likely to end up marginalized: out of school and out of work. Immigrants feel discriminated against more often in Europe. Perceived discrimination is particularly acute among the European-born children of immigrants, who in several countries still do not qualify for automatic citizenship.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: The Integration of Immigrants into American Society.  A committee of experts examined the available research to assess how immigrants are integrating into American society in a range of areas such as education, occupations, health, and language. As immigrants and their descendants become integrated into U.S. society, many aspects of their lives improve, including measurable outcomes such as educational attainment, occupational distribution, income, and language ability, but their well-being declines in the areas of health, crime, and family patterns. At the same time, several factors impede immigrants’ integration into society, such as their legal status, racial disparities in socio-economic outcomes, and low naturalization rates.
Sneha Elango, Jorge Luis Garcia, James J. Heckman, Andres Hojman, NBER: Early Childhood Education. This paper organizes and synthesizes the literature on early childhood education and childcare. In it, we go beyond meta-analysis and reanalyze primary data sources in a common framework.  We consider the evidence from means-tested demonstration programs, large-scale means-tested programs and universal programs without means testing. We discuss which programs are beneficial and whether they are cost-effective for certain populations.  The evidence from high-quality demonstration programs targeted toward disadvantaged children shows beneficial effects.  Returns exceed costs, even accounting for the deadweight loss of collecting taxes.  When proper policy counterfactuals are constructed, Head Start has beneficial effects on disadvantaged children compared to home alternatives. Universal programs benefit disadvantaged children.

Michael Coelli, Domenico Tabasso, IZA: Where Are the Returns to Lifelong Learning? We investigate the labour market determinants and outcomes of adult participation in formal education (lifelong learning) in Australia, a country with high levels of adult education. Employing longitudinal data and fixed effects methods allows identification of effects on outcomes free of ability bias. Different trends in outcomes across groups are also allowed for. The impacts of adult education differ by gender and level of study, with small or zero labour market returns in many cases. Wage rates only increase for males undertaking university studies. For men, vocational education and training (VET) lead to higher job satisfaction and fewer weekly hours. For women, VET is linked to higher levels of satisfaction with employment opportunities and higher employment probabilities.
Peter B. Berg et al, IZA: The Relationship Between Establishment Training and the Retention of Older Workers: Evidence from Germany .In the coming years, a substantial portion of Germany's workforce will retire, making it difficult for businesses to meet human capital needs. Training older workers may be a successful strategy for managing this demographic transition. This study examines relationships between establishment training programs, wages, and retirement among older men and women. Using unique matched establishment-employee data from Germany, the authors find that when establishments offer special training programs targeted at older workers, women – and especially lower wage women – are less likely to retire. Results suggest this relationship may be due to greater wage growth. For men, findings suggest establishment offer of inclusion in standard training programs may improve retention of low wage men, but analysis of pre-existing differences in establishment retirement patterns suggests this relationship may not be causal. Our research suggests targeted training programs likely play an important role in retaining and advancing careers of low wage older women.

Facundo Alvaredo, Tony Atkinson, Salvatore Morelli, VOX: The importance of wealth concentration and why it is so difficult to measure. The concentration of personal wealth has received a lot of attention since the publication of Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the 21st Century. This column investigates the UK and finds wealth distribution to be highly concentrated. The data seem to suggest that the top wealth share has increased in the UK over the first decade of this century.
W. Bradford Wilcox, Robert I. Lerman, Joseph Price, Brookings: Strong families, prosperous states: Do healthy families affect the wealth of states? Economics has its roots in the Greek word oikonomia, which means the “management of the household.” Yet economists across the ideological spectrum have paid little attention to the links between household family structure and the macroeconomic outcomes of nations, states, and societies. This is a major oversight because, as this report shows, shifts in marriage and family structure are important factors in states’ economic performance, including their economic growth, economic mobility, child poverty, and median family income.

Richard V. Reeves, Brookings: Realism trumps purism. The report, Opportunity, Responsibility, and Security: A Consensus Plan for Reducing Poverty and Restoring the American Dream, is the result of a year’s work by scholars of different ideological stripes and interests. Here are six of the ideas contained in the report which could make a serious dent in poverty: 1. An increase in the minimum wage (“large enough to substantially improve the rewards associated with work among the less-skilled”). 2. Tougher work requirements in welfare, especially for TANF and SNAP recipients. 3. More charter schools. 4. More resources to help low-income students to and through college. 5. A clear public commitment to the importance of marriage for raising children. 6. Greater access to contraception and parenting support.
Raj Chetty, Nathaniel Hendren, Harvard University: The Impacts of Neighborhoods on Intergenerational Mobility Childhood Exposure Effects and County-Level Estimates. To what extent are children’s opportunities for upward economic mobility shaped by the neighborhoods in which they grow up? We study this question using data from de-identified tax records on more than five million children whose families moved across counties between 1996 and 2012. The study consists of two parts. In part one, we show that the area in which a child grows up has significant causal effects on her prospects for upward mobility. In part two, we present estimates of the causal effect of each county in the United States on a child’s chances of success. Using these results, we identify the properties of high- vs. low-opportunity areas to obtain insights into policies that can increase economic opportunity.

Shilo Rea, CMU: Not Mere Trickery: Effects of Behavioral Nudges Persist Despite Disclosure. Nudging people toward particular decisions by presenting one option as the default can influence important life choices. However, many policymakers and some critics of behavioral interventions have raised serious ethical concerns, arguing that nudging people toward an option without their awareness is unethical, and that defaults only work because people are not aware that they are being manipulated by them. George Loewenstein investigated whether the common assumption that defaults don’t work if people are aware of them is true. The researchers found that warning people that they were about to be nudged, or informing them after the fact and allowing them to change their decisions, did not significantly diminish the effectiveness of the default option.

No comments:

Post a Comment