Charles I. Jones, NBER: The Facts of Economic Growth. Why are people in the richest countries of the world
so much richer today than 100 years ago? And why are some countries so much
richer than others? Questions such as these define the field of economic growth. This paper documents the facts that underlie
these questions. How much richer are we
today than 100 years ago, and how large are the income gaps between countries?
The purpose of the paper is to provide an encyclopedia of the fundamental facts
of economic growth upon which our theories are built, gathering them together
in one place and updating the facts with the latest available data.
Roland Fryer, Clark Medalist 2015, American Economic
Association. Roland
Fryer in a series of highly-influential studies has examined the age profile
and sources of the U.S. racial achievement gap as measured by standardized test
scores for children from 8 months to seventeen years old. Fryer (with Steven Levitt) has shown the
black-white test score gap is quite small in the first year of life, but black
children fall behind quickly thereafter (“Testing for Racial Differences in
Mental Ability among Young Children,” American Economic Review 2013). The
racial test score gap is largely explained by racial differences in
socioeconomic status at the start of schooling (“Understanding the Black-White
Test Gap in the First Two Years of School,” Review of Economics and Statistics
2004), but observable family background and school variables cannot explain
most of the growth of the racial test score gap after kindergarten. Fryer’s comprehensive chapter in the Handbook
of Labor Economics (2011, “Racial Inequality in the 21st Century: The Declining
Significance of Discrimination”) documents that racial differences in social
and economic outcomes today are greatly reduced when one accounts for
educational achievement gaps. He
concludes that understanding the obstacles facing minority children in K12
schools is essential to addressing racial inequality. Fryer has taken up this challenge to study
the efficacy of education policies to improve the academic achievement and
economic outcomes of low-income and minority children.
Gianna Claudia Giannelli, Chiara Rapallini, IZA:
Immigrant Student Performance in Math: Does It Matter Where You Come From? The performance gap in math of immigrant students is
investigated using PISA 2012. The gap with respect to non-immigrant schoolmates
is first measured. The hypotheses that first (second) generation students
coming from (whose parents come from) countries with a higher performance in
math fare better than their immigrant peers coming from lower-ranked countries
are then tested on a sample of about 13,000 immigrant students. The estimated
average immigrant-native score gap in math amounts to -12 points. The results
show that immigrant students coming from higher-ranked origin countries have a significantly
lower score gap, and are thus relatively less disadvantaged. For example,
coming from a country in the top quintile for math and having attended school
there for one year improves the absolute score gap by nearly 39 points, the
highest coefficient among the variables that reduce the gap, such as parental
education and socio-economic status.
Janet C. Gornick,
Branko Milanovic, LIS: Income Inequality in the United States in
Cross-National Perspective: Redistribution Revisited. Our key point is that, when we estimate
population-wide redistribution levels (as in Figure 1), the lesser reliance on
income transfers by older American households reduces the overall level of
redistribution in the US relative to other countries. Once older households are
removed, market income inequality (for the working age population) in the US is
seen to be comparatively high – higher than we would conclude from Figure 1
alone.
Charlotte Cabane, Adrian Hille, Michael Lechner, IZA:
Mozart or Pelé? The Effects of Teenagers' Participation in Music and Sports. Using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel, this
paper analyses the effects of spending part of adolescents' leisure time on
playing music or doing sports, or both. We find that while playing music
fosters educational outcomes compared to doing sports, particularly so for girls
and children from more highly educated families, doing sports improves
subjective health. For educational outcomes, doing both activities appeared to
be most successful. The results are subjected to an extensive robustness
analysis including instrumental variable estimation and a formal sensitivity
analysis of the identifying assumptions, which does not reveal any serious
problems.
No comments:
Post a Comment